Monthly Archive for February, 2007

Do Not Hire This Lawyer To Fight Your Traffic Ticket

From May It Please the Court:

When you pay someone $100 to fight an eviction or 10 bucks to fight a traffic ticket, you may want to ask the person doing the work to see his bar license. He probably doesn’t have one. The low fee may be your first clue.

But when George Robotis appeared in an Illinois criminal court, Judge John Kirby noticed that the “lawyer” hadn’t included his bar number on the pleading he filed to represent a criminal defendant. That was the second clue. The Judge asked him for his bar number, and according to Eric Herman of The Chicago Sun-Times, who had a source in the courtroom, Mr. Robotis responded, “Oh, I’m not an attorney.”

The Judge promptly hooked up Mr. Robotis, who’s now in jail under $75,000 of bail. He’s charged with one misdemeanor count, and it’s likely more will follow. He’s been “representing” people for over a year, according to this article in the Sun-Times, not only in Illinois, but also in Indiana.

Anyone else who “hired” Mr. Roberts should call 773-869-6403 and ask for Sheriff Tom Darts. The Sheriff says Mr. Robotis has an extensive criminal record, stretching to some 30 convictions, which include 23 for larceny, robbery, narcotics and weapons charges.

Just the kind of “lawyer” I want to hire.

Resolutions for a Law Student as a Summer Associate

From Thrown for a Loop:

Around this time of year, most people start to think of New Year’s resolutions they’ll keep with a vengence for a few weeks, then lose interest in as semesters start, work picks up and all life generally rears its ugly head and shows why you’ve become so fat/inconsiderate/spendthrifty in the first place. This year, I’m not making any yearlong resolutions I can’t keep. Instead, I’m going to focus on the few short months during which I will be a summer associate at my unnamed biglaw firm.

I worry because my last job was a bit of a bust. Sure, I spent the last year or so planning to go to law school, studying for the LSAT, applying to law schools and eventually trying to keep it a secret that I was going to one so as not to have all the grunt work heaped on my desk while the ladder-climbers focused on more enriching work. Despite this, I did spend a year there with no immidiate future plans that I didn’t really take advantage of. I came to resent my boss, moonlighted at a second job, didn’t stay late as a result and generally treated my position within the company as my terminal point.

What I’m going to write may look like boring corporate-speak, but all of those corporate-speak books have a point: you can be a little more self-aware and succeed, or you can let it all hang out and be yourself (your unhappy self). Assuming I can keep myself out of the river during summer associate outings, I’m 95% assured of an offer after the summer is over. That being said, I can set myself up for a good job with potential, or two or three miserable years before I lateral or go in-house somewhere, having not learned how to succeed within an organization. Therefore, I’m going to focus on these things:

Love Thy Boss. He may be the guy who gives you work and chews you out when you screws up, but he’s the guy you’re stuck with, so hating him is counterproductive. Smile. Be nice.

No Resentment. Sometimes people do better than you because they’re kiss-asses, they’re smarter, more attractive or just plain lucky. Their success doesn’t have to mean your failure, so try and stay out of rivalries and make friends.

Don’t Mock People. Many people will pretend to have a sense of humor about it even if they hate it. Stay positive when talking about your coworkers.

Keep it Rated G. Your friends may love your patently offensive humor, but not everybody does, nor should you expect them to right out of the gate.

Law School Professor Speaks Out On Emails from Students

From LawCulture:

Do most faculty members really suffer from a constant deluge of borderline inappropriate emails from students? In my case, the answer is: no, not a deluge, but certainly a trickle. A few of my favorite examples: the time when a student emailed me by accident in the middle of class no less, (ah, the joys of wireless access in the classroom) while trying to write some other person with my name (oh, the horror of ‘auto-fill’ technology). She whined about her ex-boyfriend and asked me to come with her to a party that night where she feared she’d run into him. Ooops! Then there was the time when a student wrote to me asking if I could tape record the next three classes for her because she was going to the carribean for a week because she got a really good deal on a resort.

Frankly, though, these are exceptions. Most of the academic year, the biggest problem I have with email is sheer quantity: when my inbox is overrun, the information overload means that sometimes messages move off of my mental radar screen (and too far down my inbox) before I get to them.

When exam-time comes around, however, I do sometimes have real problems with student email. Students will sometimes write very long and detailed questions mere days — or sometimes hours — before the exams. Some of these are really good questions. Some of them are really bad questions. (The ones that really get to me are when a student writes me instead of looking up something that is literally written down in the casebook or in the Federal Rules of Evidence. Whatever my job is, it’s surely NOT to spend my time directing you to the appropriate page of your book as finals approach in order to remind you that Rule 801(d)(2) clearly states in the language of the rule that it applies only when offered against a party. . . .) So yes, I do wish that some of my students would better internatlize the basic adage: if you can figure out the answer yourself by doing five minutes of research, please don’t bug the professor about it.

But this isn’t the only issue, or perhaps even the main one. At the end of term time, I’ve sometimes felt that I could spend my entire workday answering student questions via email — and I still might not get through all of them! At some point a couple of years ago, when I’d spent at least half an hour answering just one student’s extremely detailed email, and during that same half an hour, three more equally lengthy lists of questions had appeared in my inbox, I realized that this was going to have to stop. So I’ve instituted a new rule: I don’t take substantive questions via email in the week before the exam. I do set up lots of extra office hours during this time. If students want to bother coming in, I’ll certainly talk to them. And during the course of the semester, I”m delighted to have students email me about substance. But email during exam period? Uh-uh.