Monthly Archive for October, 2007Page 2 of 10

You Can Get a DUI Even If You’re Not Driving

An appellate court ruled that a conviction for driving under the influence of alcohol can be imposed on someone who isn’t driving but is behind the wheel.

Say what?

Well, David Montalvo, 36, was sleeping in his GMC pickup truck in the parking lot of a Market Place Deli, apparently sleeping off the effects of his drinking from the night before. A police officer from the Hamburg Police Department knocked on his pickup truck window at 5am in the morning. When Montalvo awoke, the officer instructed him to take a Breathalyzer test due to suspicion of drinking, but Montalvo refused to take the test.

Montalvo was arrested and entered a forced conditional guilty plea. His lawyer, Evan M. Levow, argued that the officer had no reasonable grounds to suspect a criminal activity on a guy sleeping in his truck. One key piece that may have affected the situation is that his car was running, although it was parked. The temperature was 25 degrees Fahrenheit so he apparently had the heater running.

The appellate court disagreed with Montalvo and Levow.

“From the perspective of the officer on the scene, I don’t find at all that what he was doing was unreasonable. In fact, I find it would have been unreasonable to have stopped his inquiries at any point short of what he did,” said Superior Court Judge Thomas Critchley Jr. “The officer wanted to make sure the driver was ‘okay,’ nothing was wrong with the businesses and that the truck was operating properly. We are convinced that under the facts as observed by Officer Aaronson defendant was lawfully subject to limited inquiry based upon an objectively reasonable exercise of the officer’s community caretaking function.”

Now the sleeping motorist has a DUI on his record, a “driver responsibility” tax of $3000, miscellaneous fines and fees of around $1000 and legal bills to take care of.

Doesn’t seem right to me. Wasn’t he doing the right thing sleeping off his drunkenness in a parking lot?

I can see both sides of it.

On one hand, the police officer has a duty to keep drunk drivers off the street. How can he be assured that half an hour later he’d wake up and still being intoxicated drive around and smash into something or someone?

On the other hand, it’s much better to have a drunk driver sleeping it off in a parking lot than trying to get home drunk. Do you think maybe this ruling may cause more people to drive home drunk because they’ll be scared a cop will give them a DUI for stopping somewhere to sober up? It’s a tough situation for sure.

Legal Filing: A-1303-06T5 STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. DAVID MONTALVO
(SUSSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

How to Use Lemon Laws

From shlep:

lemonsG The Jan. 16, 2007 edition of HALT’s bimonthly eJournal gives a summary of the legal reform group’s accomplishments in 2006. Included was the publication of three new Citizens Legal Guides. In addition to one on Small Claims Court, and another on Living Trusts, HALT produced a 7-page online brochure ”Lemon Laws: What Do I Do If My Car Is a Lemon? ” (2006, pdf version) It’s a great place to go for an introduction to the laws that protect you when you’ve purchased a new vehicle with defects that prove to be unrepairable (apparently, about 1% of all new cars). The guide can “help you determine if your car is a lemon, tell you what you can do about it, and direct you to resources for additional information.”

The HALT brochure reminds us that “Each state has enacted its own ‘lemon law, which entitles consumers to a replacement vehicle or a refund for a defunct car. These laws are based upon the federal Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act and the Uniform Commercial Code.” Generally, you’ll need to know:

  • the criteria your state uses for deciding whether a car is a lemon; towTruckG
  • when and how consumers must give notice to the manufacturer; and
  • the remedies you have as a consumer if the manufacturer is unable to repair the vehicle within a set number of attempts.

If you aren’t able to reach an agreement with your auto dealership, the next step is arbitration. HALT briefly explains the process and says “Hiring a lawyer is not necessary for the arbitration as long as you are organized and prepared.” If you are unable to resolve the dispute with the manufacturer through arbitration, “you can file a claim in civil court. Although it isn’t required, you may feel more comfortable hiring a lawyer before going to court.” If so, HALT recommends finding a firm that specializes in lemon law disputes and sets out questions to ask to help determine if a firm is likely to represent you well. The last page of the brochure has many good sources with additional information on lemon laws. The guide concludes with good advice:

lemonadeG ”Regardless of how you end up taking action, careful preparation and patience will increase your chances of making a successful claim under your state’s lemon laws. These laws are on your side to help, but you’ll need to be organized and follow the procedures required by your state.”

State Laws: Your rights will depend on the laws of the particular state where you live or where you bought the car. One place to look is Lemon Law America, which has links to each state’s lemon law, as well as contact information for “affiliated” lawyers around the country who are experienced with lemon law claims.

Other Recources: You can find more Lemon Law information, and more links to helpful resources at Nolo.com, in the article “Your Rights If Your Car Is a Lemon.”

ReturnToSender Consumers (especially anyone wanting to act without a lawyer) and consumer advocates should also consider purchasing ($16) Return to Sender: Getting A Refund or Replacement for Your Lemon Car, by Nancy Barron, which the National Consumer Law Center says “provides practical advice on how consumers can successfully enforce this right through their state lemon law, either on their own or with the help of a lawyer.”

More generally, the Federal Trade Commission has compiled a lot of online materials for consumers relating to buying (and financing) a new or used car.

Example of Thinking Like a Law Student and Not Like a Lawyer

From Shelley’s Case:

A week ago, the professor asked us to write an analysis re: an inpatient hospital reimbursement appeal. S/he divided our class into two teams, one focused on procedural issue, the other focused on substantive issue.

Both teams looked at the relevant CFR the professor had provided and applied legal analysis to the facts. We each came up with an analysis and presented them to the professor over the weekend.

Today the professor chastised us. S/he was disappointed that we were thinking like law students, not attorneys. S/he advised us to stop thinking like law students and start analyzing like an attorney.

The words stung and puzzled us. Most of the students were 3L’s. We worked during summer under the supervision of attorneys. We thought we were thinking and analyzing like attorneys. What did the professor mean when s/he said we were thinking like law students?

Could it be that for this assignment, we were not digging deeper? That we were not creative in grasping little clues? Could it be that the summer experience was a superficial experience where we were told to do specific tasks but not trained to look deeper into a case?

What does it take to think like an attorney? I thought I had the answer but now I wonder if I really did.