Archive for the 'Courts of Law' CategoryPage 2 of 3

The Stupidest Things Lawyers and Witnesses Say In a Court of Law

What follows is a selection of the most idiotic phrases ever uttered in a court of law by attorneys and their witnesses. Three cheers for the permanence of official court records! If you’d like more of this sort of idiocy, you should take a look at Disorder in the Court.

* Lawyer: “Was that the same nose you broke as a child?”
* Witness: “I only have one, you know.”

* Lawyer: “Now, Mrs. Johnson, how was your first marriage terminated?”
* Witness: “By death.”
* Lawyer: “And by whose death was it terminated?”

* Accused, Defending His Own Case: “Did you get a good look at my face when I took your purse?”

The defendant was found guilty and sentenced to ten years in jail.

* Lawyer: “What is your date of birth?”
* Witness: “July 15th.”
* Lawyer: “What year?”
* Witness: “Every year.”

* Lawyer: “Can you tell us what was stolen from your house?”
* Witness: “There was a rifle that belonged to my father that was stolen from the hall closet.”
* Lawyer: “Can you identify the rifle?”
* Witness: “Yes. There was something written on the side of it.”
* Lawyer: “And what did the writing say?”
* Witness: “‘Winchester’!”

* Lawyer: “What gear were you in at the moment of the impact?”
* Witness: “Gucci sweats and Reeboks.”

* Lawyer: “Can you describe what the person who attacked you looked like?”
* Witness: “No. He was wearing a mask.”
* Lawyer: “What was he wearing under the mask?”
* Witness: “Er…his face.”

* Lawyer: “This myasthenia gravis — does it affect your memory at all?”
* Witness: “Yes.”
* Lawyer: “And in what ways does it affect your memory?”
* Witness: “I forget.”
* Lawyer: “You forget. Can you give us an example of something that you’ve forgotten?”

* Lawyer: “How old is your son, the one living with you?”
* Witness: “Thirty-eight or thirty-five, I can’t remember which.”
* Lawyer: “How long has he lived with you?”
* Witness: “Forty-five years.”

* Lawyer: “What was the first thing your husband said to you when he woke that morning?”
* Witness: “He said, ‘Where am I, Cathy?’”
* Lawyer: “And why did that upset you?”
* Witness: “My name is Susan.”

* Lawyer: “Sir, what is your IQ?”
* Witness: “Well, I can see pretty well, I think.”

* Lawyer: “Did you blow your horn or anything?”
* Witness: “After the accident?”
* Lawyer: “Before the accident.”
* Witness: “Sure, I played for ten years. I even went to school for it.”

* Lawyer: “Trooper, when you stopped the defendant, were your red and blue lights flashing?”
* Witness: “Yes.”
* Lawyer: “Did the defendant say anything when she got out of her car?”
* Witness: “Yes, sir.”
* Lawyer: “What did she say?”
* Witness: “‘What disco am I at?’”

* Lawyer: “Doctor, before you performed the autopsy, did you check for a pulse?”
* Witness: “No.”
* Lawyer: “Did you check for blood pressure?”
* Witness: “No.”
* Lawyer: “Did you check for breathing?”
* Witness: “No.”
* Lawyer: “So, then it is possible that the patient was alive when you began the autopsy?”
* Witness: “No.”
* Lawyer: “How can you be so sure, Doctor?”
* Witness: “Because his brain was sitting on my desk in a jar.”
* Lawyer: “But could the patient have still been alive nevertheless?”
* Witness: “Yes, it is possible that he could have been alive and practicing law somewhere.”

* Lawyer: “How far apart were the vehicles at the time of the collision?”

* Lawyer: “And you check your radar unit frequently?”
* Officer: “Yes, I do.”
* Lawyer: “And was your radar unit functioning correctly at the time you had the plaintiff on radar?”
* Officer: “Yes, it was malfunctioning correctly.”

* Lawyer: “What happened then?”
* Witness: “He told me, he says, ‘I have to kill you because you can identify me.’”
* Lawyer: “Did he kill you?”
* Witness: “No.”

* Lawyer: “Now sir, I’m sure you are an intelligent and honest man–”
* Witness: “Thank you. If I weren’t under oath, I’d return the compliment.”

* Lawyer: “You were there until the time you left, is that true?”

* Lawyer: “So you were gone until you returned?”

* Lawyer: “The youngest son, the 20 year old, how old is he?”

* Lawyer: “Were you alone or by yourself?”

* Lawyer: “How long have you been a French Canadian?”

* Witness: “He was about medium height and had a beard.”
* Lawyer: “Was this a male or a female?”

* Lawyer: “Mr. Slatery, you went on a rather elaborate honeymoon, didn’t you?”
* Witness: “I went to Europe, sir.”
* Lawyer: “And you took your new wife?”

* Lawyer: “I show you Exhibit 3 and ask you if you recognize that picture.”
* Witness: “That’s me.”
* Lawyer: “Were you present when that picture was taken?”

* Lawyer: “Were you present in court this morning when you were sworn in?”

* Lawyer: “Do you know how far pregnant you are now?”
* Witness: “I’ll be three months on November 8.”
* Lawyer: “Apparently, then, the date of conception was August 8?”
* Witness: “Yes.”
* Lawyer: “What were you doing at that time?”

* Lawyer: “How many times have you committed suicide?”
* Witness: “Four times.”

* Lawyer: “Do you have any children or anything of that kind?”

* Lawyer: “She had three children, right?”
* Witness: “Yes.”
* Lawyer: “How many were boys?”
* Witness: “None.”
* Lawyer: “Were there girls?”

* Lawyer: “You don’t know what it was, and you didn’t know what it looked like, but can you describe it?”

* Lawyer: “You say that the stairs went down to the basement?”
* Witness: “Yes.”
* Lawyer: “And these stairs, did they go up also?”

* Lawyer: “Have you lived in this town all your life?”
* Witness: “Not yet.”

* Lawyer: (realizing he was on the verge of asking a stupid question) “Your Honor, I’d like to strike the next question.”

* Lawyer: “Do you recall approximately the time that you examined the body of Mr. Eddington at the Rose Chapel?”
* Witness: “It was in the evening. The autopsy started about 8:30pm.”
* Lawyer: “And Mr. Eddington was dead at the time, is that correct?”

* Lawyer: “What is your brother-in-law’s name?”
* Witness: “Borofkin.”
* Lawyer: “What’s his first name?”
* Witness: “I can’t remember.”
* Lawyer: “He’s been your brother-in-law for years, and you can’t remember his first name?”
* Witness: “No. I tell you, I’m too excited.” (rising and pointing to his brother-in-law) “Nathan, for heaven’s sake, tell them your first name!”

* Lawyer: “Did you ever stay all night with this man in New York?”
* Witness: “I refuse to answer that question.
* Lawyer: “Did you ever stay all night with this man in Chicago?”
* Witness: “I refuse to answer that question.
* Lawyer: “Did you ever stay all night with this man in Miami?”
* Witness: “No.”

* Lawyer: “Doctor, did you say he was shot in the woods?”
* Witness: “No, I said he was shot in the lumbar region.”

* Lawyer: “What is your marital status?”
* Witness: “Fair.”

* Lawyer: “Are you married?”
* Witness: “No, I’m divorced.”
* Lawyer: “And what did your husband do before you divorced him?”
* Witness: “A lot of things I didn’t know about.”

* Lawyer: “And who is this person you are speaking of?”
* Witness: “My ex-widow said it.

* Lawyer: “How did you happen to go to Dr. Cherney?”
* Witness: “Well, a gal down the road had had several of her children by Dr. Cherney and said he was really good.”

* Lawyer: “Doctor, how many autopsies have you performed on dead people?”
* Witness: “All my autopsies have been performed on dead people.”

* Lawyer: “Were you acquainted with the deceased?”
* Witness: “Yes sir.”
* Lawyer: “Before or after he died?”

* Lawyer: “Mrs. Jones, is your appearance this morning pursuant to a deposition notice which I sent to your attorney?”
* Witness: “No. This is how I dress when I go to work.”

* The Court: “Now, as we begin, I must ask you to banish all present information and prejudice from your minds, if you have any.”

* Lawyer: “Did he pick the dog up by the ears?”
* Witness: “No.”
* Lawyer: “What was he doing with the dog’s ears?”
* Witness: “Picking them up in the air.”
* Lawyer: “Where was the dog at this time?”
* Witness: “Attached to the ears.”

* Lawyer: “When he went, had you gone and had she, if she wanted to and were able, for the time being excluding all the restraints on her not to go, gone also, would he have brought you, meaning you and she, with him to the station?”
* Other Lawyer: “Objection. That question should be taken out and shot.”

* Lawyer: “And lastly, Gary, all your responses must be oral. Ok? What school do you go to?”
* Witness: “Oral.”
* Lawyer: “How old are you?”
* Witness: “Oral.”

* Lawyer: “What is your relationship with the plaintiff?”
* Witness: “She is my daughter.”
* Lawyer: “Was she your daughter on February 13, 1979?”

* Lawyer: “Now, you have investigated other murders, have you not, where there was a victim?”

* Lawyer: “Now, doctor, isn’t it true that when a person dies in his sleep, in most cases he just passes quietly away and doesn’t know anything about it until the next morning?”

* Lawyer: “And what did he do then?”
* Witness: “He came home, and next morning he was dead.”
* Lawyer: “So when he woke up the next morning he was dead?”

* Lawyer: “Did you tell your lawyer that your husband had offered you indignities?”
* Witness: “He didn’t offer me nothing. He just said I could have the furniture.”

* Lawyer: “So, after the anesthesia, when you came out of it, what did you observe with respect to your scalp?”
* Witness: “I didn’t see my scalp the whole time I was in the hospital.”
* Lawyer: “It was covered?”
* Witness: “Yes, bandaged.”
* Lawyer: “Then, later on…what did you see?”
* Witness: “I had a skin graft. My whole buttocks and leg were removed and put on top of my head.”

* Lawyer: “Could you see him from where you were standing?”
* Witness: “I could see his head.”
* Lawyer: “And where was his head?”
* Witness: “Just above his shoulders.”

* Lawyer: “Do you drink when you’re on duty?”
* Witness: “I don’t drink when I’m on duty, unless I come on duty drunk.”

* Lawyer: “Any suggestions as to what prevented this from being a murder trial instead of an attempted murder trial?”
* Witness: “The victim lived.”

* Lawyer: “The truth of the matter is that you were not an unbiased, objective witness, isn’t it? You too were shot in the fracas.”
* Witness: “No, sir. I was shot midway between the fracas and the naval.”

* Lawyer: “Officer, what led you to believe the defendant was under the influence?”
* Witness: “Because he was argumentary, and he couldn’t pronunciate his words.”

Attorneys Barred From Wearing Deodorant in Court

From Legal Underground:

I usually think it’s best to attend depositions in person. But I’ll make an exception if I ever get a letter such as the one a friend received last week in a mass-tort case:

Dear Counsel:

If you intend on participating in person in the cross-noticed deposition of Dr. H—, please be advised that Dr. H— is highly allergic to all fragrances found in hair spray, perfumes, deodorants, aftershave lotion and other such substances. Washing down after applying these fragrances will not be sufficient to prevent Dr. H— from suffering an allergic reaction. If any person attending the deposition in person fails to adhere to these requirements, the deposition will be stopped.

We appreciate your cooperation in ensuring there is not an unnecessary cancellation of this deposition.

A cramped roomful of lawyers who have been prohibited from wearing deodorant? I think I’d attend by telephone.

Mock Jury Trials by TrialJuries Gives a More Economic Alternative

From Illinois Trial Practice Weblog:

Do you find mock trials too expensive? TrialJuries advertises itself as “Mock Juries for the Rest of Us.” Here’s what its website says–

Traditional mock juries are prohibitively complex and expensive for all but the rarest of cases. No longer! TrialJuries.com makes this valuable tool available to regular lawyers with regular cases.

How does it work?

Attorneys log onto the TrialJuries site and submit a case. The first step is to complete a short form with basic information to help you identify the case, and to let us know where it is pending so that we can assign jurors from the correct venue.

After that, you have a few choices: you can make a “Text” submission in which you add a written “statement of the case” from the side of both plaintiff and defendant. Or, you can submit audio or video files for your statements of the case (much like opening statements would be in the real trial). Add exhibits as well if you like. Then just add your Verdict questions and Feedback questions using our “form builder” and you’re ready to “send your case to the jury.”

The basic fee is $1,500. TrialJuries is also soliciting jurors, who are paid $30 to “review the attorneys’ case submissions and answer their questions,” which should “take about an hour.”

I wonder if it works. The feedback would certainly be interesting, but if I understand the system correctly, it doesn’t include the give-and-take and argument among mock jurors that’s one of the best things about mock trials, that is, watching your case being picked apart in real time from behind two-way glass. There’s nothing quite like that experience for learning about the strengths and weaknesses of your case.