Get Caught Stealing and Face Public Humiliation
Imagine carrying a sign in front of the local courthouse that reads: “I stole from a local store.”
Imagine doing that at 12pm. Under the hot beating sun. With sweat dripping down your forehead. For two hours.
If you get caught stealing and you end up in Putnam County Judge Peter Miller’s courtroom, that just might be your punishment.
”It is better than going to jail, but it’s not fair,” said Rashane Lewis, who was arrested for being the lookout in a Wal-Mart while a friend of hers took some children clothes.
Over the past twelve years, Judge Miller has sentenced over 600 people to these unusual punishments either outside the courthouse or at the store where the incident took place. Walking around with an embrassing sign is his preferred method to deal with shoplifters.
According to the administration of the Putnam Count probation system has said only three of Judge Miller’s sign carriers has repeated their offense. He, along with other judges around the United States believe that public penitence, involving some sort of public humiliation works to rehabilitate convicted offenders.
‘If you see someone marching up and down in front of a store, you may think twice before stealing. I’m not going to say it is going to prevent it, but it will stop the one who did it from doing it again,” said Judge Miller.
He gives the offenders an option. Take a 30-60 day jail sentence or endure two hours of public embarassment. Along with their choice, they must perform 25 hours of community service, they have six months of probation and they are fined $294.
Like I mentioned earlier, Judge Miller isn’t the only judge in the U.S. to have these unusual and creative sentencing ideas.
Take Ohio Municipal Court Judge Michael A. Cicconetti in Painesville for example. Teens had yelled “Pigs” to some local police officers. He had the teens stand on a busy street corner with a pig and a sign reading, “This is not a police officer.” He had three men who were arrested for soliciting prostitution wear chicken suits and carry a sign with them that read, “There is no chicken ranch in Painesville.” He also sentenced a couple who stole a baby Jesus statue from a manger to dress up as the Virgin Mary and Joseph and walk around Painesville with a donkey at their side.
In Harris County, Texas Judge Larry Standley had a man who hit his wife take yoga classes as a form of anger management.
In San Francisco, a man convicted of mail fraud was sentence by a judge to walk outside of a post office with a sign reading, “I stole mail. This is my punishment.”
“We don’t like it, but what he does is legal,” says Assistant Public Defender Mack Brunton. “It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to know that this is his way to encourage them not to do it again. It seems to work fairly well.” When defendents are given the option of either jail or carrying a sign, most people “cringe.”
“They hate it. They would rather jump off a cliff than carry the sign. They would pay more money. They would swim the English Channel,” says Mr. Brunton.
There is precedent for these public humiliation sentences in history, so don’t think this is anything new. Back in colonial times, those that broke the law were made to sit in stocks, which consisted of a frame in which the culprit’s hands and/or feet were confined while the offender remained seated. Villagers would taunt these people and throw rotten fruits and vegetables. And yes, they would sometimes even throw excrement. That’s when you know your neighbors really don’t like you.
A Connecticut professor at the Quinnipiac University School of Law named Quilliam V. Dunlap has researched cases that end in an usual sentence. He hasn’t come across any studies that reveal anything about whether jail time or public humiliation is a better crime deterrent.
”They don’t amount to cruel and unusual punishment. They are unusual, but most of them as not as cruel as sending someone to jail or prison,” said Mr. Dunlap.
Even though it may be preferable to jail time, those that have to undergo the humiliation don’t seem to like it. “This is just a humiliating stunt,” said Wal-Mart shoplifter Rashane Lewis.
Did you like this article?
Related Posts
- Public Defenders or Private Defense Lawyers: Who’s Better?
- Petition Started to Permit Live Webcasting During Public Trials
- Nebraska Court Throws Out Claim For T-shirt That Caught Fire
- National Public Radio Attacks Lawyers and the Legal Profession
- Face Veils and Driver License Photos: CAIR Survey Released
Uh, since when is calling police “pigs” illegal?
Aaron, if you don’t know why, looks like you may be wearing a sign of your own soon…..
I remember about 20 yrs ago there was a judge in Connecticut that sentenced a man to spend the night in the city dump after he tried to abandon some puppies there. Seemed appropriate to me!
Awesome!!
The idea of humiliation is briliant not only for crimes but also for schools. Like standing against a wall with the back to the class… or wearing a DUNCE cap … I think that it would be very effective now since our society is becoming more and more immune to “regular” punishment.
Do you seriously mean that stealing from Walmart is a crime???
Too bad we don’t have Walmart stores here in France. We would make them pay dearly for the humiliation they have inflicted on a disgruntled customer.
Kudos to the judge for being creative!
By using a little embarrassment to stop illegal behavior, he is also helping to ensure that the offender and the general public learned something too.
I find it funny when, people say that they feel the judges methods of discipline are ‘cruel’. In my opinion, people that outright break the law and are smug enough to think that they are entitled to, should be judged and forced to take accountability for the choices that they made. What is cruel is the disservice that some punishments do to our society. Putting people in jail for example, and forgetting about them, does nothing to keep people from wanting to reoffend. Jail does not teach any valuable lessons to anyone.
Embarrassment works because, although it doesnt leave bruises on the outside. Worse yet, it forces the offender to be singled out of a crowd, and to publicly have his misdeeds
spotlighted for all to see. Now, they have no choice but to assume accountability and responsibility for the choices that they made. Again, these bad decisions were not made by anyone, but, the offender.
This punishment causes even the most hard hearted people to feel something for what they did.
Lets face the truth, nobody enjoys having their idiodic, mean or just plain wrong choices known. Even when the choices were made on purpose. We humans like to appear as intimidating as as Mt. Kilimanjaro, fierce and prideful like a lion king protecting his young, and as unbreakable as the air we breathe. So there is nothing quite like a public scolding to return us right back to our childhood.
I absolutely believe that if all of our nations punishable consequences followed this basic principal. Maybe then we would have more appreciation, respect and reverence for ourselves and others and for where we live and what we have.
But until then, to the judges that went for the road less traveled, Thank you! Your communities are a safer place to live, not, because you took the easy path and put the bad guys in jail and walked away. BUT, because you have taught valuable lessons, and educated the nation.And, you found a way to make the punishment hurt bad enough, that people dont want to get in trouble.
I disagree 100% with Dannilyn’s comment.
Quite a few people clearly enjoy waching people, and their families, being humiliated in public. These criminals have not killed, or abused children, or raped women or boys. They have been found guilty of minor “crimes”, like stealing in a supermarket, or of imaginary, victimless, “crimes” like having sex with a prostitute. And some prosecutors-politicians like to arrest people, many of them were found innocent later, and organize perp walks, with cameras rolling, right in time for the 6 o’clock news.
Again, as I said last year on this site, supermarkets here in France would have to close down if they agreed to have shoplifters wear humiliating signs in public. And outraged onlookers would destroy the signs.
America is the last Western country which still has the death penalty, and your “intentional homicide” rates are far higher than ours (except for the small Baltics).
Now you want to bring back the pillory, or chain gangs of men and women working in public. Full speed astern to the Middle Ages!