Oldest Prison Inmate in New York Has Been Freed
Now he’s free to enjoy life.
At 89 years old.
Charles E. Friedgood, avoided being fried good on the electric chair and is now out. He was a wealthy surgeon in Long Island who was convicted way back in 1976 of murdering his wife and is now in a veteran’s hospital.
“There is a reasonable probability that, if released, this inmate will live and remain at liberty without violating the law,” said the parole commissioners. Yeah, I’ll definitely agree that at age 89, his best crime years are behind him.
He will now participate in an anger management course (undoubtedly the “old guy” at the classes), will undergo a mental evaluation, and cannot contact the victim’s family. Which happens to include his own children and grandkids unless there’s a parole officer present.
Sixth times’ a charm
He actually was considered for release six times before they let him free.
“While some have formally expressed opposition to this inmate’s release, for various reasons, they are significantly outnumbered by those expressing support for his release.”
Money was a factor
Now don’t go thinking that the parole commission was being really nice that day and decided to let this ol’ grandfather go. Money plays a role. The doctor has terminal cancer, has undergone many operations, including a colostomy. All these have amounted to $300,000 in costs for the state.
How did he murder his wife?
Originally, the investigators on the case ruled that his wife Sophie died from a stroke. This was recorded on her death certificate. However, the police were very suspicious because Dr. Friedgood signed the death certificate himself and then made sure her body was rushed out of New York for a quick burial. When the medical examiners fully examined the body, they discovered he used his state medical license to get responsibility for his ailing wife and then inject her five times with Demerol which killed her. He was then arrested five weeks later at Kennedy International Airport with $450,000 of his wife’s money, bonds, and jewelry. He was actually on his way to Europe to hook up with his mistress, who was a Danish nurse with whom he had two kids already with. He was then tried and subsequently convicted of second-degree murder.
Final comments by the parole commissioners
One commissioner, Chris Ortloff, vigorously opposed the release. He felt that releasing Dr. Friedgood, “so deprecates the seriousness of his offenses, the murder of his wife and subsequent grand larceny of hundreds of thousands of dollars from her estate, as to undermine respect for the law. In colloquial terms, this case, given the inmate’s advanced age and medical prognosis, raises the proverbial question: ‘If any offense deserves the maximum sentence of life in prison, does this one not do so?’”
Most, however, were sympathetic to Dr. Friedgoods advanced age.
“During your interview, you repeatedly cited your status as a senior citizen. It is important to recognize that your actions deprived your wife of the ability to enjoy such status.” said commissioner Thomas P. Grant. However, “the likelihood of your engaging in criminal activity in the community is virtually non-existent.”
Should senior citizen status be enough to parole a convicted murderer?
Related Posts:
Danish Nurse and 450.000$ sounds good – but to kill your wife…
As a law school student just starting criminal law, I can see why they let him go, but I still feel that it is an offense to the entire system. Life in prison is a perfectly reasonable and legal sentence for first degree murder, and it should be served. Something like this sets precedent for others to be released early, and not all are “harmless.” Not to mention the fact that advanced age is not necessarily evidence of being reformed or being unable or unlikely to commit another crime.
89 Years old… i wonder how many times he was banged in the butt.
When you’ve lived a full “life” THEN you can state that “life in prison is a perfectly reasonable and legal sentence” the reason for the legal system is (or at least should be in my opinion) to remove potential threats from society in a humane manner … this guy is fucking 89 … besides the old fart’s takin up space.
The moral implications of a life term spent in prison compared to spending the last years of one’s life with treatments necessary to fight cancer is rather easy for me to reason. I’ve had treatment for Hep C with alpha interferon. The treatments bring with it the same side effects that come from chemo treatments for cancer patients. The side effects are more than enough punishment (if he’s still having chemo). The side effects are horrible, such that I was forced to discontinue the treatments. If he followed the same and quit treatments with the cancer not in remission, he’ll die soon anyway. So does it really matter? Not really. He’ll still face judgment in the end anyway.
If you don’t think an 89 year old man is a threat, you haven’t read the cases that I have. The one that sticks out in my mind is the 100 year old man who attempted to rape a young woman and actually succeeded in harming her, although the actual rape did not come to fruition. And I don’t have to live a full life to know that he took one and that he’s been given back part of his. This sets precedent for other early releases, and one of THOSE may not be this old and may be very dangerous. Early release happens all the time, and people have been seriously harmed or died because of it. The more this happens (no matter the circumstances) the more cases other inmates will have to point to in order to support their release. It’s a slippery slope.
Agreed.
Definitely an idea to think about.
It really is a slippery slope.
Slippery slope is right!
It’s made me think about it also.
:/
I can definitely understand where you’re coming from on this.
You guys have completely missed the point. Releasing Dr. Friedgood had nothing to do with being merciful to elderly inmates, and not a whole lot to do with public safety.
Dr. Friedgood was released so that the state could free itself from having to absorb the costs of treating his terminal cancer.
Personally, I think it’s a logical practice. Why should the state absorb the cost of treating terminally ill prisoners, when it could simply release these prisoners and absolve itself of the burden?
I realize that money was the reason. But if you set economic loss as a reason for releasing inmates, it will happen more often with more dangerous inmates. And do we really want someone getting hurt or killed for the sake of saving money?
But that’s the thing, because on the flipside there are resources that are being diverted from: Medical Programs, Law Enforcement, Education, and other goverment responsibilities to put these inmates up and keep them alive. Resources that could have been utilized to save lives, educate the young, and provide goods and services…were instead wasted on removing Dr. Friedgood’s crap-factory.
But perhaps it’s the entire paradigm that’s the problem. Is simply segregating criminals into prisons really the best solution we can come up with? There’s got to be a better way.
I don’t think that people who have committed such heinous crimes that they were sentenced to life imprisonment should be released. The cost of keeping them in prison is not enough to release those inmates.
This guy is old!
Do you guys think he should be freed or just rot in jail?
This is a tough situation for sure!
This man is old – so if he gets released then he’s not likely to kill again.
Is there a better solution? Can we send him to a mental asylum (crazy house)?
what is he gona do at age 89 steal some adult dipers.
What a dumb criminal. To sign your own wife’s death certificate ? OOooooo. Not a good move.
well what about being given life in prison for a crime u didn’t commit? but a jury finds you guilty on first degree murder only because some black kid had to take the rap.how about not being (able money wise )to hire a real lawyer,and all the evident u have don’t mean nothing because u have a state appointed asshole who had never tried a murder case.and how about being 19 yrs. old at that time,and now your 39 yrs old. i guesssome folks have all the luck.and like myself some have all the pain.
ellis stroud #613250
columbia correctional
Lake City Fl
ps.feel free to offer your sevices.pro bono
Poncho (Ellis Stroud), it would appear you raped an underage child, using force, on February 12th, 1989. I’m pretty sure February 12th of 1989 was not a day you are proud of.
It would also appear as though you were involved in two separate counts of burglary or robbery while armed with a deadly weapon. On top of that, you were charged with, and convicted of, murder in the 1st degree (premeditated and/or attempted), and a separate count of aggrivated battery. Let’s face it man, May 9th of 1989 was not a good day for you either.
You were 19, you were out of control, and your multiple charges and subsequent convictions proves it. I am certain the state did not just invent the evidence against you.
You don’t need a pro bono lawyer. What you need is to take accountability for your actions, and do your life sentence.
Does it suck for you? I can only imagine it does. There are many reasons why the majority of the populace doesn’t commit such crimes. Just to name a few, they are because we don’t want to find out how much a life sentence sucks, because we enjoy our freedom, and because we have moral values – which it would appear as though you lacked when you were 19 years of age.
I’m sure your parent(s) tried to raise you right, but you had a thug’s mind set, and weren’t going to do right by anyone’s account. That is nobody’s fault but your own. To top things off, the fact that you’re asking for pro bono assistance here is quite tacky.
I hope you get butt banged, hardcore style, for having sexually battered an underage child. I hope your attackers use much worse force banging you in the butt, than you used on your poor underaged victim. I hope you’re treated in prison as you treated all your victims.
Fish.
Let me guess. You didn’t do any of what you were charged with, and convicted of, but somehow the state invented the evidence to put you, an innocent man, away in prison for life… If only I had a penny for every time I’ve heard such trash, and a penny more for every time such trash talkers later found God while in prison.
Enjoy the Florida State Penal System, and try taking responsibility for your freakin’ actions for a change. If you get paroled, it would be a blow to the legal system, considering how you appear to not desire to take responsibility for your actions and do your time. Maybe you will become the oldest prison inmate in Florida at some point. That’d make your family proud – just as proud as they were of you 20 years ago when you were out of control, and 19 years ago when you were convicted and placed in the clink…
well what aboout being given life in prison for a crime u didn;t commit.?but a jury finds u guilty on first degree murder only because some black kid had to take the rap.how about not being able(money wise) to hire a real lawyer,and all the evidents that you had don;t mean nothing because u have a court appointed asshole who had never tried a case period, not to mention a murder case! and how about being 19 yrs. old at that time.and now your 39.i guess some folks have all the luck and like myself some have all the pain.
Ellis Stroud#613250
columbia correctional
Lake City Fl 32025
please!!! If there is anyone out there that may be able to help me .god bless u
Hey… great little play on words… “Friedgood avoided being fried good…”
HAHHAAHA
THERE IS REALLY NO COMMON SENSE IN THE LEGAL COMMUNITY… LET ALONE ANY COMPASSION… DO WE WANT 90 YEAR OLD PEOPLE WALKING OUR PRISONS…THEY POSE NO THREAT …IN ILLINOIS THE AVE TIME IN PRISON FOR MURDER IS 14 YEARS… THIS IS UNLESS IT IS A HIGH PROFILE CASE, THAN THE PAROLE BOARD IS AFRAID TO RELEASE ANYONE.. THIS GUY HAS SERVED 30 YEARS, ITS TIME TO BE RELEASED… BUT THE ONLY REASON THERE RELEASING THIS OLD MAN IS THEY DONT WANT TO PAY FOR HIS MEDICAL CARE…THE PEOPLE OF CALIFORNIA SHOULD BE RELEASING SUSAN ATKINS WHO IS DYING, BUT AGAIN NO COMMON SENSE, AND NO COMPASSION.. THAS LADY HAS BEEN IN 40 YEARS, LONGER THAN ANY WOMAN IN CALIFORNIA….SHE HAS ONE LEG AND IS ALMOST COMPLETLY PARALIZED… IT HAS COST 300 THOUSAND TO GUARD HER HOSPITAL ROOM…HOW INSANE IS THAT…
Hey Ted,
Susan Atkins should not be released. California has the right idea. Keep that nutjob locked away from society. That woman had NO compassion when she participated in eight separate killing sprees done by the Manson Family. Why the heck should she be shown any compassion? Because the State of California is having a financial crunch?
The way she’s going downhill health-wise, why release her now? She’ll be dead soon enough, and she deserves no compassion. I fully support the State of California not releasing Susan Denise Atkins. The state not releasing her should send a strong message that they are willing to stick to their guns, despite financial hardships, and not release heinous murderers under any circumstances.
dam that old guy is dume if i was going to kill my wiff i wouled not kill her for 450.000 grand mabey if she had like 10.000.000.000 bill than i will kill my wiff and than i would move realy far out of state