Rupert Murdoch Phone Hacking Scandal: News of the World Shutting Down

August 21, 2011 by · 4 Comments / Leave a Comment or Question
Filed under: Business Law 

Rupert Murdoch, the 80 year old Australian-American whose full name is Keith Rupert Murdoch, is said to be the most influential man in the world. As the CEO and Chairman of News Corporation, he is considered one of the world’s most powerful people with a financial worth of 6.3 billion dollars (USD).

He started his path to wealth with one very small newspaper in Adelaide, then went on to start different publications in Australia. He expanded his News Corporation to the United Kingdom, the Asian market, and the United States. In the United States, in 1986, he began the Fox Broadcasting Company.

Murdoch claims that the rumors of his empire crumbling is all lies and that he is not losing his grip on his media empire. He is the center of a phone hacking scandal that took place originally in the United Kingdom where Murdoch’s employees were involved in hacking into voice mails. In the United States they were alleged to have bribed law enforcement officials to obtain telephone numbers of families of the victims of the 9/11 terrorist tragedy.

In the United Kingdom, Murdoch apologized for the scandal that involved two of his top executives. The apology was written as a full page ad in the Wall Street Journal. He further claimed that the apology and fixing the mistakes are only the first steps. Another apology that was not signed by Murdoch offered to cooperate with the police.  Chris Bryant, a British lawmaker and one who campaigns against media abuse, has stated that he feels a public relations consultant told Murdoch what to write in his apology and that it sounds more like a confession than an apology. He doubts the public will accept the apology.

This telephone hacking scandal has placed the British police under pressure for accepting money and other bribes for illegal actions. Telephone hacking was reported to the police as far back as the year 2005 but nothing was done about it. In fact, Wallis, a man that was arrested in the telephone hacking incident, was hired by the police as a consultant for a wage of 24,000 pounds for working two days a week.

The News of the World newspaper, which is owned by Murdoch and which is now closed, was said to have hacked into thousands of telephones including that of a thirteen year old girl that had been murdered. Murdoch apologized to the parents of the little girl which was akin to a confession that the News of the World had indeed hacked into the voicemails of the murdered girl. This caused Murdoch to shut the paper down.

James Murdoch, Rupert Murdoch’s successor and son, had taken over the operations in Europe of the News Corporation just when the telephone hacking scandal was beginning. James and Rupert will face a tough questioning by Britain’s Parliament.

Wikileaks Founder Julian Assange Arrested and Faces Rape Charges

July 20, 2011 by · Comment Here / Leave a Comment or Question
Filed under: Criminal Law 

Julian Paul Assange, the founder of Wikileaks has been arrested for allegedly raping two women in Sweden. The native Australian claims the allegations are all motivated politically and that he is not guilty of raping the women. Assange leaked diplomatic information through his many websites and is therefore fearful that he may be extradited to the United States.

The women said that they did not have consensual sex with Assange and that he forced his attentions on them, in one instance violently. Assange was in Sweden giving a lecture when he was invited to the homes of the victims. The Court of Appeals has heard the women’s testimony and Assange is now appealing the decision of the district Judge ordering his extradition to Sweden. He is wanted for questioning in Sweden with regard to the rape allegations. One of the women claimed that Assange said he wanted to impregnate women. However, he allegedly said he preferred to impregnate virgins because he would then be assured of being the first to impregnate them.

Assange is not without his supporters who have set up barriers and carried banners in front of the British Royal Courts of Justice. They were asking for Assange to be freed. Assange is currently being held under house arrest at the Ellingham Hall in Bungay, Norfolk, UK.

Another woman that had consensual sex with Assange asked what they would do if she got pregnant. He allegedly told her that Sweden was a great place to raise kids. She also claimed she was railroaded into telling the police about the attack. All she wanted was for Assange to be tested for possible sexually transmitted diseases.

Representing Assange is QC Ben Emmerson who states that there was consensual sex between Assange and one of the women. The woman claimed to have been attracted to him when she saw him appear on television. She said that when she was only partially awake she had consensual sex with him.

Prosecutors in Sweden also charge that even if Assange had consensual sex, since he allegedly didn’t wear a condom, this is against Swedish law. If you have consensual sex in Sweden without a condom, it is punishable by a term of imprisonment of a minimum of two years for rape.

The other woman said sex with Assange was definitely not consensual, and that he treated her violently; he had broken her necklace, tore off all her clothing, and then held her down in such a way so that she was not able to move away from him.

The names of both women were withheld by the Court. Judgment was reserved in this case by Lord Justice Thomas and Mr. Justice Ouseley. A warrant for Assange’s arrest was issued in August of 2010, and he has steadily claimed he did nothing wrong. When the prosecutor said there was no evidence of rape, Assange left the country some eight days later. However, there was another European warrant issued for his arrest on September 1, 2010.

Assange continues to assert that the claims against him are motivated politically in order to eventually extradite him to the United States to stand trial for his Wikileaks actions as the United States government was shocked at the mass leads of diplomatic information.

Federal Poker Indictments Against The 3 Largest USA Poker Casinos

July 18, 2011 by · Comment Here / Leave a Comment or Question
Filed under: Federal Law 

Federal investigators have taken control of the domain names of the three largest online poker companies in the United States: Poker-Stars, Full-Tilt-Poker and Absolute-Poker.

The reason for the domain name takeover is due to their continuing serving casino players within U.S. jurisdiction despite the ban raised on internet poker and gambling, which has resulted in accusations of fraud against financial institutions.

Billions worth of gaming revenue were dramatically impacted after these $3 billion laundering penalties was charged against the companies and defendants.  Eleven defendants were charged in New York, including the Poker-Stars, Full-Tilt-Poker and Absolute-Poker founders with fraud, laundering and illegal gambling.

The big three poker casinos are not being singled out in the FBI’s cross-hairs, as five other internet domains hosting poker games were taken over as well.  Company assets and their payment processors assets were also included in the complaint and actions were issued in relation to their bank accounts.

As internet gaming has became more and more popular, online poker rode along with a huge burst of popularity despite it’s legality in the USA remaining ambiguous.  It is now clear after these actions by the USA government that proving online gambling to USA citizens is a federal crime, causing much anxiety among other casinos serving customers in the USA.

The poker websites that had their domain names taken over now show the warning message “It is also a federal crime to knowingly accept, in connection with the participation of another person in unlawful Internet gambling, credit, electronic fund transfers, or checks”.  According to the indictments, fraudulent methods are said to be used by poker companies, including tricking banks to accept credit card payments from these players.

The charges include information on how companies wormed through the 2006 ban, as money received from gamblers are masked and reflected as purchases for online goods or other products that are nonexistent.

Among those who were charged were Isai Scheinberg and Paul Tate (Poker-Stars), Raymond Bitar and Nelson Burtnick (Full-Tilt-Poker), and Scott Tom and Brent Beckley (Absolute-Poker).
Despite knowing that their actions were against the U.S. law, the defendants are said to be aware of their actions, took the risk and continued the scheme until the indictments came down.

Payment processors who were charged along with them were Ryan Lang, Ira Rubin, Bradley Franzen and Chad Elie.  They were charged after posing for the poker companies to U.S. banks and doing the cover-up for them by creating pseudo-corporations and websites.

« Previous PageNext Page »