Sharon Keller or Sharon Killer: Texas Judge Refuses to Hear Appeal and Now Put on Trial
A senior Texas judge who refused to hear a last-minute appeal from a prisoner facing execution because her office “closed at five” was put on trial Monday in one of the most high-profile cases of alleged judicial misconduct in the state’s history.
Sharon Keller, dubbed Sharon Killer by her detractors, was the subject of a hearing at the Texas commission on judicial conduct that could ultimately see her removed from the bench.
The case relates to her handling of the imminent execution of a convicted rapist and murderer, Michael Richard, on 25 September 2007. That morning the U.S. supreme court had cast doubt on the constitutionality of using lethal injection – the form of death administered by Texas – by agreeing to rule on whether it amounted to cruel and unusual punishment.
Lawyers for Richard raced to file an appeal that would put a stay on his execution, which was due to take place that evening, but they were delayed by computer glitches.
They contacted Keller, who by then had gone home to deal with a worker doing repairs to her house. When, at 4:45 p.m., they requested a postponement of the execution, her reply was: “We close at five.”
At 8:23 p.m. Richard was put to death.
The apparently callous handling of the case led to a storm of protest and headlines around the world. Keller later claimed that she had been unaware of the lawyers’ technical problems.
Keller faces charges including denying the rights of a condemned man. She is the highest-ranking judge to face misconduct proceedings.
A Republican, she has a reputation for her tough approach to justice in a state known already for its hard line on crime. In 1998 she ruled in a case involving a man with learning difficulties, denying him a retrial despite DNA evidence that appeared to prove his innocence.
[thanks to crazytales562 and Free Internet Press / CC BY 3.0]
Related Posts
- The Craziest Notice of Appeal Ever
- The Best Way to Hire a Lawyer: How It Feels to Be a Judge
- Judge Gives His Verdict on Lawyers Gone Wild
- Lawsuit Against Banking Lawyer for Reckless Misconduct
- Citizens Cannot Use CAN-Spam to Sue Spammers: District Court Rejects Appeal
- Adult Age Verification Gets Struck Down By a Federal Judge
- Why Law School Has Not Lost Its Appeal To Me
- His Pants Are On Fire: How Judge Roy Pearson Sued Cleaners
- Real Life Sopranos Plays Out in Chicago Trial
- Alabama Refuses the Sale of Sex Toys Due to Public Morality Regulation
THE CONSTITUTION
They keep talking about drafting a Constitution for
Iraq …. Why don’t we just give them ours? It was
written by a lot of really smart guys, it has worked for
over 200 years, and we’re not using it anymore.
I’m SURE Judge Keller–being a staunch Republican– is WELL AWARE of the Consequences: “An eye for a eye, and a tooth for a tooth.”